High-fidelity entangled photon pairs from a quantum-dot-based single-photon source
Malwina A. Marczak, Spencer J. Johnson, Mark R. Hogg, Timon L. Baltisberger, Nathan Arnold, Benjamin E. Nussbaum, Clotilde M. N. Pillot, Sascha R. Valentin, Arne Ludwig, Paul G. Kwiat, Richard J. Warburton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a high-fidelity, semiconductor quantum dot-based source of entangled photon pairs suitable for quantum networks, surpassing traditional SPDC sources in fidelity and indistinguishability.
Contribution
The authors develop a novel quantum dot microcavity system that produces entangled photon pairs with over 98% fidelity and high indistinguishability, advancing scalable quantum network technology.
Findings
Achieved 96.1% entanglement fidelity, improved to 98.1% with post-selection.
Generated entangled photon pairs at rates exceeding 0.5 Gpairs/sec.
Produced mutually indistinguishable photons suitable for entanglement swapping.
Abstract
Entangled photon pairs are a ubiquitous resource in quantum technologies, used in quantum key distribution and quantum networking as well as fundamental tests of non-locality. For scalable quantum networks, pairs that are indistinguishable in all unentangled degrees of freedom are essential, as they enable high-fidelity entanglement swapping across network nodes. To date the most-studied sources of "swappable" entangled photon pairs have been based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in non-linear crystals. However, the probabilistic nature and unavoidable trade-off between brightness and unwanted multi-photon emission limits their performance in lossy channels. Here, we demonstrate a high-fidelity source of "swappable" entangled photon pairs using a semiconductor quantum dot (QD) coupled to a tunable microcavity. By actively modulating the QD emission between orthogonal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
