ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes
David Kurniadi Angdinata, Evan Chen, Chris Cummins, Ben Eltschig, Dejan Grubisic, Leopold Haller, Letong Hong, Andranik Kurghinyan, Kenny Lau, Hugh Leather, Seewoo Lee, Simon Mahns, Aram H. Markosyan, Rithikesh Muddana, Ken Ono, Manooshree Patel, Gaurang Pendharkar, Vedant Rathi

TL;DR
Under the assumption of the abc conjecture, the paper proves that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes, providing an upper bound on the primes it attains and suggesting it may still take infinitely many prime values.
Contribution
The paper establishes a new conditional upper bound on the prime values of Ramanujan's tau function assuming the abc conjecture, showing it misses a density 1 subset of primes.
Findings
Proves S(X) = O(X^{13/22}) assuming abc conjecture.
Shows Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes.
Heuristic predicts S(X) should be infinite with order ~ C X^{1/11}/(log X)^2.
Abstract
Lehmer conjectured that Ramanujan's tau-function never vanishes. In a related direction, a folklore conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes arise as absolute values of Ramanujan's tau-function. Recently, Xiong showed that these prime values form a subset of the primes with density at most . Assuming the Conjecture, we prove the stronger upper bound \[ S(X):=\#\{\ell\le X:\ \ell\ \text{prime and } |\tau(n)|=\ell \text{ for some } n\ge 1\} = O(X^{13/22}), \] which implies that Ramanujan's tau-function misses a density 1 subset of the primes. We give a heuristic suggesting that should nevertheless be infinite, with predicted order of magnitude \[ S(X)\asymp \frac{C X^{\frac{1}{11}}}{(\log X)^2}. \] The main engine in this note was formalized and produced automatically in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
