
TL;DR
This paper develops a non-Archimedean version of Chase's lemma, extending previous work by removing cardinality restrictions and broadening the lemma's applicability in non-Archimedean frameworks.
Contribution
It formulates and verifies a non-Archimedean analogue of Chase's lemma, extending prior results to a more general non-Archimedean context.
Findings
Successfully formulated a non-Archimedean analogue of Chase's lemma.
Extended the lemma to non-Archimedean counterparts of existing extensions.
Removed restrictions of cardinality in the non-Archimedean setting.
Abstract
We formulate and verify a non-Archimedean analogue of Chase's lemma. Following the framework by K.\ Eda removing restriction of cardinality from analogy on direct product between countability and non--measurability, we extend the non-Archimedean analogue of Chase's lemma to a non-Archimedean counterpart of the extension by K.\ Eda of the extension by M.\ Dugas and B.\ Zimmermann-Huisgen of Chase's lemma.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
