Conventional and Unitarity-Conserving Peccei-Quinn Inflation Models and ACT
J.McDonald

TL;DR
This paper compares conventional and unitarity-conserving Peccei-Quinn inflation models, showing the latter aligns better with ACT data and permits larger axion decay constants, impacting dark matter constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a unitarity-conserving PQ inflation model and analyzes its compatibility with observational data and axion dark matter constraints.
Findings
Unitarity-conserving model matches ACT scalar spectral index within 1σ.
Conventional PQ inflation is more than 2σ below ACT central value.
Unitarity-conserving model allows larger axion decay constants $f_a$.
Abstract
We compare conventional non-minimally coupled Peccei-Quinn (PQ) inflation with a version of the model in which unitarity conservation is imposed by additional Jordan frame interactions. Assuming instantaneous reheating, the unitarity-conserving model is within 1 agreement with the central value of the scalar spectral index reported by the ACT collaboration, whereas conventional PQ inflation is more than 2 below the ACT central value. In the case where dark matter is composed of axions and PQ symmetry is not restored after inflation, the axion isocurvature constraint of the unitarity-conserving model typically allows a much larger axion decay constant than the conventional model, with the conventional model upper bound being comparable only if the PQ scalar self-coupling is extremely small, . For , the axion isocurvature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
