Large subgroups of fusion systems and localities

TL;DR

This paper explores how large p-subgroups influence the structure and classification of fusion systems and localities, extending group-theoretic concepts to these categorical frameworks.

Contribution

It introduces new definitions of large subgroups within fusion systems and localities, and analyzes their properties and relations, linking classification results to these structures.

Findings

Defined large subgroups for fusion systems and localities

Showed the correspondence of large subgroups under the fusion-locality relation

Provided a new characterization of the 2-fusion system of Aut(G2(3))

Abstract

Saturated fusion systems are categories modeling properties of conjugacy of p-subgroups in finite groups. It was shown by Chermak that they correspond nicely to group-like structures called localities. In this paper we start to explore how concepts and results from a program of Meierfrankenfeld, Stellmacher and Stroth, aiming to reprove and generalize parts of the classification of the finite simple groups, translate to fusion systems and localities. Central in the program is the notion of a large $p$-subgroup. The presence of a large $p$-subgroup in a finite group turns out to be strong enough information to nearly classify the entire $p$-local structure, while also accommodating a very large class of groups of interest including many groups of Lie type in defining characteristic $p$. Utilizing the group-theoretical definition of a large $p$-subgroup as a blueprint, we define large subgroups of fusion systems and localities. We then analyze how the three definitions relate to each other, showing in particular that the newly defined notions behave well under the correspondence between saturated fusion systems and localities with certain properties. We further proceed with an example of how classification results from the program of Meierfrankenfeld et.al. translate to fusion systems and localities. In more detail, we give a new characterization of the $2$-fusion system of $\operatorname{Aut}(\operatorname{G}_2(3))$ following the strategy in a paper of Meierfrankenfeld and Stroth, where the group $\operatorname{Aut}(\operatorname{G}_2(3))$ is characterized in a similar fashion.