Industrial Policy with Network Externalities: Race to the Bottom vs. Win-Win Outcome
Nigar Hashimzade, Haoran Sun

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how industrial policies in high-tech sectors with network externalities can lead to either a race to the bottom or mutual benefits, depending on market conditions and innovation types.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework showing when industrial policy can foster mutual gains versus destructive competition in network externality-driven markets.
Findings
Weak externalities lead to a race to the bottom, reducing welfare.
Strong externalities and weak substitutability can produce mutual welfare gains.
Product innovation enhances network effects more than process innovation.
Abstract
Industrial policy has returned to the centre of economic governance, particularly in the high-tech sectors where positive network externalities in demand make market dominance self-reinforcing. This paper studies the welfare effects of an industrial policy targeting a sector with network externalities in a two-country model with strategic trade and R&D investment. We show how the welfare consequences of this policy are determined by the interaction between the strength of the externality, the type of R&D, and the degree of product differentiation between the home and the imported goods. When externalities are weak or the goods are close substitutes, the business-stealing effect produces a race to the bottom that dissipates more surplus than it creates. Under sufficiently strong externalities and weak substitutability or complementarity of the goods, industrial policy competition can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
