Non-perturbative CPMG scaling and qutrit-driven breakdown under compiled superconducting-qubit control: a single-qubit study
Jun Ye

TL;DR
This study investigates non-perturbative effects in superconducting qubits under CPMG sequences, revealing axis-dependent breakdowns, partial coherence revival, and the impact of bath memory on decoherence.
Contribution
It introduces a non-perturbative analysis of CPMG scaling in superconducting qubits, highlighting axis-dependent effects and the insensitivity of control-layer details to scaling observables.
Findings
Y-CPMG shows axis-dependent scaling-law breakdown and coherence revival.
X-CPMG maintains power-law scaling with non-Markovian bath effects.
Waveform differences remain undetectable across coupling strengths, indicating control-layer invisibility.
Abstract
Decoherence in superconducting qubits emerges from the interplay of multilevel dynamics and structured environmental noise, yet perturbative models cannot capture all resulting signatures. Here, EmuPlat couples instruction-set-architecture-level waveform generation to the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) under non-Markovian pure dephasing. In the resulting non-perturbative regime -- where filter-function predictions become quantitatively uninformative -- CPMG scaling of a three-level superconducting transmon yields one calibration result, two physical findings, and one structural null. Y-CPMG exhibits axis-dependent scaling-law breakdown -- non-monotonic decoherence, partial coherence revival, and pronounced X--Y population asymmetry ( vs ) -- driven by third-level anharmonicity amplified by bath memory; X-CPMG maintains well-behaved power-law scaling with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
