PAR$^2$-RAG: Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning for Multi-Hop Question Answering
Xingyu Li, Rongguang Wang, Yuying Wang, Mengqing Guo, Chenyang Li, Tao Sheng, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth

TL;DR
PAR$^2$-RAG introduces a two-stage retrieval and reasoning framework that improves multi-hop question answering by balancing coverage and commitment, leading to significant accuracy gains.
Contribution
It presents a novel planned active retrieval and reasoning method that outperforms existing approaches on multiple benchmarks by separating evidence coverage from reasoning commitment.
Findings
Achieves up to 23.5% higher accuracy on MHQA benchmarks.
Provides up to 10.5% retrieval gains in NDCG.
Outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across four benchmarks.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) remain brittle on multi-hop question answering (MHQA), where answering requires combining evidence across documents through retrieval and reasoning. Iterative retrieval systems can fail by locking onto an early low-recall trajectory and amplifying downstream errors, while planning-only approaches may produce static query sets that cannot adapt when intermediate evidence changes. We propose \textbf{Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning RAG (PAR-RAG)}, a two-stage framework that separates \emph{coverage} from \emph{commitment}. PAR-RAG first performs breadth-first anchoring to build a high-recall evidence frontier, then applies depth-first refinement with evidence sufficiency control in an iterative loop. Across four MHQA benchmarks, PAR-RAG consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines, compared with IRCoT, PAR-RAG achieves up…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
