An Economic Framework for Generative Engines: Advertising or Subscription?
Luyang Zhang, Cathy Jiao, Beibei Li, Chenyan Xiong

TL;DR
This paper develops a dynamic economic model to analyze how generative engines like ChatGPT decide between showing ads or offering ad-free subscriptions, balancing immediate revenue and long-term user engagement.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework capturing query-level decisions and derives optimal policies for monetization strategies considering competition and user sensitivity.
Findings
Optimal ad policy follows a cutoff rule based on immediate payoff versus long-term value.
High ad revenue or low user sensitivity shifts policy toward more ads.
Presence of rivals encourages more ad-free responses to sustain user retention.
Abstract
Generative Engines (GEs) such as ChatGPT and Google's AI Overviews are rapidly reshaping search economics by delivering synthesized responses that allow users to bypass third-party websites, cutting those sites' advertising revenue. Yet this shift also leaves GEs facing their own monetization problem: whether to insert ads into synthesized responses or keep them ad-free to drive subscription conversions. In this paper, we introduce a dynamic framework to study this problem, which captures how query-level design choices shape user engagement, retention, and subscription conversion over time. Using this framework, we show that the optimal policy follows a cutoff rule: ads should only be shown to users only when the immediate ad payoff exceeds the long-term value of providing ad-free responses. This cutoff shifts toward with-ad responses when i) ad revenue is high or ii) users are less…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
