Drop the Hierarchy and Roles: How Self-Organizing LLM Agents Outperform Designed Structures
Victoria Dochkina

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that self-organizing multi-agent LLM systems can spontaneously develop roles and outperform traditional hierarchical coordination, especially with capable models and minimal structural scaffolding.
Contribution
It provides extensive empirical evidence that emergent self-organization in LLM agents enhances performance without pre-defined roles, scaling effectively up to 256 agents.
Findings
Self-organizing agents spontaneously invent roles and form shallow hierarchies.
Hybrid protocols outperform centralized coordination by 14%.
Emergent autonomy scales with model capability and system size.
Abstract
How much autonomy can multi-agent LLM systems sustain -- and what enables it? We present a 25,000-task computational experiment spanning 8 models, 4--256 agents, and 8 coordination protocols ranging from externally imposed hierarchy to emergent self-organization. We observe that autonomous behavior already emerges in current LLM agents: given minimal structural scaffolding (fixed ordering), agents spontaneously invent specialized roles, voluntarily abstain from tasks outside their competence, and form shallow hierarchies -- without any pre-assigned roles or external design. A hybrid protocol (Sequential) that enables this autonomy outperforms centralized coordination by 14% (p<0.001), with a 44% quality spread between protocols (Cohen's d=1.86, p<0.0001). The degree of emergent autonomy scales with model capability: strong models self-organize effectively, while models below a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
