Bell's Inequality, Causal Bounds, and Quantum Bayesian Computation: A Unified Framework
Nick Polson, Vadim Sokolov, Daniel Zantedeschi

TL;DR
This paper reveals a unified framework connecting Bell inequalities, causal inference, and quantum Bayesian computation, highlighting their structural similarities and implications for quantum and causal modeling.
Contribution
It establishes a detailed correspondence between quantum Bell inequalities and causal inference bounds, extending to algorithmic, entropic, and computational complexity formulations.
Findings
Bell inequalities and causal bounds share the same polytope structure.
Quantum Bayesian computation exploits non-commutativity for speedups.
The framework creates a dictionary linking quantum information, causal inference, and Bayesian methods.
Abstract
Bell inequalities characterize the boundary of the local-realist correlation polytope -- the set of joint probability distributions achievable by classical hidden-variable models. Quantum mechanics exceeds this boundary through non-commutativity, reaching the Tsirelson bound for CHSH. We show that this polytope structure is not specific to quantum foundations: it appears identically in the causal inference literature, where the instrumental inequality, the Balke--Pearl linear programming bounds, and the Tian--Pearl probabilities of causation all arise as facets of the same marginal compatibility polytope. Fine's theorem -- that CHSH inequalities hold if and only if a joint distribution exists -- is precisely the pivot: the instrumental variable model in causal inference is structurally equivalent to the Bell local hidden-variable model, with the instrument playing the role…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
