Working Paper: Towards a Category-theoretic Comparative Framework for Artificial General Intelligence
Pablo de los Riscos, Fernando J. Corbacho, Michael A. Arbib

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel category-theoretic framework for describing, comparing, and analyzing different AGI architectures to unify their formal foundations and facilitate future research.
Contribution
It introduces the first algebraic, category-theoretic formalization of AGI architectures, enabling systematic comparison and analysis of diverse approaches.
Findings
Develops a category-theoretic formalization for RL, Causal RL, and SBL architectures.
Provides a foundation for unifying various AGI architectures under a common formal framework.
Lays groundwork for future empirical evaluation and property assessment of AGI systems.
Abstract
AGI has become the Holly Grail of AI with the promise of level intelligence and the major Tech companies around the world are investing unprecedented amounts of resources in its pursuit. Yet, there does not exist a single formal definition and only some empirical AGI benchmarking frameworks currently exist. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a general, algebraic and category theoretic framework for describing, comparing and analysing different possible AGI architectures. Thus, this Category theoretic formalization would also allow to compare different possible candidate AGI architectures, such as, RL, Universal AI, Active Inference, CRL, Schema based Learning, etc. It will allow to unambiguously expose their commonalities and differences, and what is even more important, expose areas for future research. From the applied Category theoretic point of view, we take as inspiration…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
