From photometric surveys to HI intensity mapping: Improving constraints on magnification biases while testing gravity
T. Sinde, J. Fonseca

TL;DR
This paper explores how combining photometric galaxy surveys with HI intensity mapping can significantly improve constraints on gravitational lensing effects and test general relativity using a multi-tracer approach.
Contribution
It demonstrates that multi-tracer analysis of galaxy and HI surveys enhances constraints on magnification bias parameters and the Weyl potential, enabling precise tests of gravity.
Findings
Multi-tracer approach improves constraints on $eta$ by factors of 25 to 50.
Constraints on $s^G(z)$ can improve by factors of 2 to 8.
Simultaneous constraints on $eta$ and $s^G(z)$ are achievable, breaking degeneracies.
Abstract
The observed large-scale structure of the Universe is not a direct measure on the underlying distribution of matter. These observations are subtly distorted by gravitational lensing effects, which leave imprints on the statistical distribution of galaxies and offer powerful test of general relativity. In this work, we investigate whether HI intensity mapping from current and forthcoming surveys can improve constraints on magnification lensing obtained from photometric galaxy surveys. In particular, can we jointly constrain the magnification bias parameters and the amplitude of the Weyl potential, which we parametrise as . We employ a Fisher matrix formalism in order to estimate future constrains on the magnification biases and . We forecast constraints for three photometric surveys (DES-like, LSST-like, Euclid-like) individually and with two HI intensity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
