Legible Consensus: Topology-Aware Quorum Geometry for Asymmetric Networks
Tony Mason

TL;DR
This paper introduces a topology-aware quorum design for asymmetric networks that separates inter-tier safety from intra-tier replication, improving failure mode clarity and latency analysis.
Contribution
It maps crumbling-wall quorum construction to tiered networks, enabling operators to identify failure modes from topology alone and analyze latency and leadership costs.
Findings
Three of four tiers retain global liveness during Mars conjunction blackout.
Consensus latency matches speed-of-light round-trip times for each tier.
The wall topology imposes a leadership cost gradient affecting Multi-Paxos elections.
Abstract
Quorum design over asymmetric topologies conflates two independent concerns: inter-tier obligation (which tiers must participate for cross-tier safety) and intra-tier replication (how each tier survives local failures). Flat quorums treat all nodes as interchangeable; when consensus fails, the structure does not reveal whether a tier was unreachable or a tier lost too many replicas. We show that mapping a crumbling-wall quorum construction to a physically tiered network separates these concerns and makes the protocol's failure modes legible: an operator can determine which tiers retain global consensus capability from the wall structure and connectivity state alone, without runtime probing. Using a 10-node Earth/LEO/Moon/Mars topology as a magnifying glass, we confirm that three of four tiers retain global liveness during Mars conjunction blackout; only the disconnected tier loses it.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
