Statistical Models for the Inference of Within-person Relations: A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model and Its Interpretation
Satoshi Usami

TL;DR
This paper discusses the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), clarifying its interpretation, practical issues, and relationship with other models for inferring within-person relations in longitudinal data.
Contribution
It positions RI-CLPM within the landscape of statistical models, explaining its assumptions, interpretation, and connections to other approaches for within-person inference.
Findings
RI-CLPM incorporates stable trait factors representing individual differences.
The stable trait factors are assumed uncorrelated with within-person variability.
The paper clarifies the relationship between RI-CLPM and dynamic panel models.
Abstract
The cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) has been widely used, particularly in psychology, to infer longitudinal relations among variables. At the same time, controlling for between-person heterogeneity and capturing within-person relations as processes of within-person change are regarded as key components to causal inference based on longitudinal data. Since Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015) criticized the CLPM for its limitations in inferring within-person relations, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), which incorporates stable trait factors representing stable individual differences, has rapidly spread, especially in psychology. At the same time, although many statistical models are available for inferring within-person relations, the distinctions among them have not been clearly delineated, and discussions over the interpretation and selection of statistical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
