Empowering Mobile Networks Security Resilience by using Post-Quantum Cryptography
Ricardo Alves Faval, Rodrigo Moreira, Fl\'avio de Oliveira Silva

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the practical integration of post-quantum cryptography into 5G core networks using a sidecar approach, quantifying latency impacts and showing a feasible path for quantum-resistant 5G security.
Contribution
It presents an experimental implementation of NIST-standardized PQC in an open-source 5G core, analyzing latency overheads and proposing a non-disruptive migration strategy.
Findings
PQC increases end-to-end SBI latency by approximately 54 ms.
Latency overhead is about 48-49 ms compared to classical TLS.
Certificate validation significantly impacts overall delay.
Abstract
The transition to a cloud-native 5G Service-Based Architecture (SBA) improves scalability but exposes control-plane signaling to emerging quantum threats, including Harvest-Now, Decrypt-Later (HNDL) attacks. While NIST has standardized post-quantum cryptography (PQC), practical, deployable integration in operational 5G cores remains underexplored. This work experimentally integrates NIST-standardized ML-KEM-768 and ML-DSA into an open-source 5G core (free5GC) using a sidecar proxy pattern that preserves unmodified network functions (NFs). Implemented on free5GC, we compare three deployments: (i) native HTTPS/TLS, (ii) TLS sidecar, and (iii) PQC-enabled sidecar. Measurements at the HTTP/2 request-response boundary over repeated independent runs show that PQC increases end-to-end Service-Based Interface (SBI) latency to approximately 54 ms, adding a deterministic 48-49 ms overhead…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
