Navigating the Mirage: A Dual-Path Agentic Framework for Robust Misleading Chart Question Answering

TL;DR

This paper introduces ChartCynics, a dual-path framework that enhances the robustness of chart question answering by detecting visual deception through structural anomaly detection and numerical verification.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel agentic dual-path approach with specialized reasoning protocols to improve the accuracy and trustworthiness of chart interpretation models.

Findings

Achieves 74.43% and 64.55% accuracy on two benchmarks.

Outperforms state-of-the-art proprietary models by ~29%.

Demonstrates the effectiveness of agentic workflows in small open-source models.

Abstract

Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations. We present ChartCynics, an agentic dual-path framework designed to unmask visual deception via a "skeptical" reasoning paradigm. Unlike holistic models, ChartCynics decouples perception from verification: a Diagnostic Vision Path captures structural anomalies (e.g., inverted axes) through strategic ROI cropping, while an OCR-Driven Data Path ensures numerical grounding. To resolve cross-modal conflicts, we introduce an Agentic Summarizer optimized via a two-stage protocol: Oracle-Informed SFT for reasoning distillation and Deception-Aware GRPO for adversarial alignment. This pipeline effectively penalizes visual traps and enforces logical consistency. Evaluations on two benchmarks show that ChartCynics achieves 74.43% and 64.55% accuracy, providing an absolute performance boost of ~29% over the Qwen3-VL-8B backbone, outperforming state-of-the-art proprietary models. Our results demonstrate that specialized agentic workflows can grant smaller open-source models superior robustness, establishing a new foundation for trustworthy chart interpretation.