Tooling for digital accessibility in mathematics: Quickly build compliant course websites that benefit all students

TL;DR

This paper introduces a workflow enabling math instructors to easily create accessible, DA-compliant course websites using open-source tools, significantly improving student outcomes in Calculus II.

Contribution

It presents a new, practical workflow for creating accessible math content with MathML, and provides empirical evidence of its positive impact on student performance.

Findings

Students in treatment sections outperformed controls by 2.4 SD in final semester.

The workflow setup takes 1-2 hours with quick updates afterward.

Student experience surveys show no negative impact from the system.

Abstract

Public universities in the US must now meet digital accessibility (DA) standards under 2024 updates to Title II of the ADA. For math instructors, course materials must be screen-reader parsable, which standard LaTeX-to-PDF workflows cannot achieve. Despite MathML's availability as a web standard for accessible math, instructor adoption of DA-compliant workflows remains very low, creating a gap between available technology and classroom practice. This paper makes three contributions. First, we present a taxonomy of existing approaches to DA-compliant math content, organized by print (PDF) versus web (HTML) output targets, analyzing tradeoffs for instructor adoption. Second, we describe a free workflow using Obsidian (Markdown-based content management), Quartz (static site generator), Git (collaboration and version control), and Cloudflare Pages (free hosting, private source files) that enables math instructors to create and publish DA-compliant course websites with MathML from TeX-based syntax. Setup takes approximately 1-2 hours; thereafter, site updates occur in minutes via a single command. A public setup tutorial is made available. Third, we present an empirical study of student outcomes across 31 sections of Calculus II over 6 semesters. Sections using the proposed system outperformed controls, with the treatment group reaching 2.4 standard deviations above the control mean in the final semester. Although all treatment sections were taught by one instructor, evidence such as acclimation trajectories of other new instructors suggests the system itself meaningfully contributes to performance gains. A student experience survey shows no statistically significant difference between groups, indicating no negative effect on experience. A proposed second study phase will assess barriers to adoption at other institutions.