Counterfactual Density Effects and the German East--West Income Gap
Georg Keilbar, Sonja Greven

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new density-based causal inference framework that captures distributional effects, applied to analyze the German East-West income gap beyond average differences.
Contribution
It develops a novel approach analyzing counterfactual densities using Bayes Hilbert spaces, extending causal inference beyond mean effects.
Findings
Identifies distributional effects explaining income gaps.
Detects nuances like probability mass differences at zero.
Provides a flexible regression model for conditional densities.
Abstract
We propose a novel framework for conducting causal inference based on counterfactual densities. While the current paradigm of causal inference is mostly focused on estimating average treatment effects (ATEs), which restricts the analysis to the first moment of the outcome variable, our density-based approach is able to detect causal effects based on general distributional characteristics. Following the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition approach, we consider two types of counterfactual density effects that together explain observed discrepancies between the densities of the treated and control group. First, the distribution effect is the counterfactual effect of changing the conditional density of the control group to that of the treatment group, while keeping the covariates fixed at the treatment group distribution. Second, the covariate effect represents the effect of a hypothetical change…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
