Sensitivity enhancement techniques for cryogenic calorimeters in the NUCLEUS experiment
M. Cappelli, A. Wallach, H. Abele, G. Angloher, B. Arnold, M. Atzori Corona, A. Bento, E. Bossio, F. Buchsteiner, J. Burkhart, F. Cappella, N. Casali, R. Cerulli, A. Cruciani, G. Del Castello, M. del Gallo Roccagiovine, S. Dorer, A. Erhart, M. Friedl, S. Fichtinger, V.M. Ghete

TL;DR
This paper introduces two techniques to enhance the sensitivity of cryogenic calorimeters in the NUCLEUS experiment, improving energy resolution and lowering detection thresholds for rare event searches.
Contribution
It presents a novel combination of signal-to-noise mapping and double readout analysis to optimize detector sensitivity in cryogenic calorimeters.
Findings
Achieved a baseline resolution of 2.94 ± 0.05 eV with a CaWO4 detector.
Identified optimal operating points for maximum sensitivity.
Lowered the energy threshold through combined readout analysis.
Abstract
Phonon-mediated cryogenic calorimeters find application in rare event searches due to their intrinsically low energy threshold. Achieving the best sensitivity for this kind of detectors is crucial for signal identification, leading to various optimization techniques. In this work, we present two complementary methods to increase the sensitivity of cryogenic detectors read out by transition-edge sensors, developed and tested in the context of the NUCLEUS experiment. The first procedure maps the signal-to-noise ratio of the device across a wide range of operating points, to identify the configuration with maximal sensitivity to be used during data taking. The second method exploits the double readout of the detector, combining the information on different channels with a two-dimensional optimum filter analysis that effectively lowers the energy threshold. With both techniques at the same…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
