Omitted-Variable Sensitivity Analysis for Generalizing Randomized Trials
Amir Asiaee, Samhita Pal, Jared D. Huling

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sensitivity analysis framework for assessing how unobserved variables might bias the generalization of randomized trial results to broader populations, using an exact decomposition and partial R-squared parameters.
Contribution
It provides a novel OVB-based decomposition for trial generalization bias and scale-free sensitivity parameters for benchmarking unobserved effect modifiers.
Findings
Bounds achieve nominal coverage in simulations
The framework remains conservative under model misspecification
Comparisons highlight interpretive advantages over existing methods
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yield internally valid causal effect estimates, but generalizing these results to target populations with different characteristics requires an untestable selection ignorability assumption: conditional on observed covariates, trial participation must be independent of potential outcomes. This assumption fails when unobserved effect modifiers are distributed differently between trial and target populations. We develop a sensitivity analysis framework for trial generalization grounded in omitted variable bias (OVB). Our key theoretical contribution is an exact decomposition showing that external-validity bias equals moderation strength moderator imbalance: (i) how strongly an unobserved variable shifts the treatment effect, times (ii) how differently that variable is distributed across populations after covariate adjustment. We introduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
