On four network monitoring parameters in graphs and their gaps
Zin Mar Myint, Avikal Srivastava

TL;DR
This paper characterizes which quadruples of four network monitoring parameters can be realized by connected graphs, providing explicit constructions for all admissible cases and identifying impossible ones.
Contribution
It offers a complete, constructive characterization of realizable quadruples of network monitoring parameters in connected graphs, including non-realizable cases.
Findings
Identified quadruples of parameters that cannot be realized by any connected graph.
Constructed explicit graphs for all admissible quadruples with linear growth in vertices and edges.
Provided a complete classification of realizable and non-realizable parameter quadruples.
Abstract
Let \( G \) be a finite simple undirected graph. Four graph parameters related to network monitoring are the \emph{geodetic set}, \emph{edge geodetic set}, \emph{strong edge geodetic set}, and \emph{monitoring edge geodetic set}, with corresponding minimum sizes, denoted by \( g(G), eg(G), seg(G) \), and \( meg(G) \), respectively. These parameters quantify the minimum number of vertices required to monitor all vertices and edges of \( G \) under progressively stricter path-based conditions. As established by Florent \textit{et al.}\ (CALDAM 2023), these parameters satisfy the chain of inequalities: \( g(G) \leq eg(G) \leq seg(G) \leq meg(G). \) In 2025, Florent \textit{et al.}\ posed the following question: given integers \( a, b, c, d \) satisfying \( 2 \leq a \leq b \leq c \leq d \), does there exist a graph \( G \) such that \( g(G) = a, \quad eg(G) = b, \quad seg(G) = c, \quad…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
