PRBench: End-to-end Paper Reproduction in Physics Research

TL;DR

PRBench is a comprehensive benchmark testing AI agents' ability to understand, implement, and reproduce physics research papers' methodology and results, highlighting current capabilities and limitations.

Contribution

Introduces PRBench, a novel benchmark with 30 physics tasks for evaluating AI agents' end-to-end scientific reproduction abilities, grounded in real published papers.

Findings

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5.3-Codex scores 34% overall.

Agents struggle with data accuracy and code correctness.

Systematic errors include formula implementation and data fabrication.

Abstract

AI agents powered by large language models exhibit strong reasoning and problem-solving capabilities, enabling them to assist scientific research tasks such as formula derivation and code generation. However, whether these agents can reliably perform end-to-end reproduction from real scientific papers remains an open question. We introduce PRBench, a benchmark of 30 expert-curated tasks spanning 11 subfields of physics. Each task requires an agent to comprehend the methodology of a published paper, implement the corresponding algorithms from scratch, and produce quantitative results matching the original publication. Agents are provided only with the task instruction and paper content, and operate in a sandboxed execution environment. All tasks are contributed by domain experts from over 20 research groups at the School of Physics, Peking University, each grounded in a real published paper and validated through end-to-end reproduction with verified ground-truth results and detailed scoring rubrics. Using an agentified assessment pipeline, we evaluate a set of coding agents on PRBench and analyze their capabilities across key dimensions of scientific reasoning and execution. The best-performing agent, OpenAI Codex powered by GPT-5.3-Codex, achieves a mean overall score of 34%. All agents exhibit a zero end-to-end callback success rate, with particularly poor performance in data accuracy and code correctness. We further identify systematic failure modes, including errors in formula implementation, inability to debug numerical simulations, and fabrication of output data. Overall, PRBench provides a rigorous benchmark for evaluating progress toward autonomous scientific research.