Adaptive procedures for boundary FDR control
Sarah Mostow, Daniel Xiang

TL;DR
This paper develops adaptive boundary FDR control procedures based on the Support Line method, improving error control and power in multiple testing under independence and some dependence structures.
Contribution
It introduces two-step adaptive procedures estimating null hypotheses and adjusting the SL method, enhancing boundary FDR control and power over existing methods.
Findings
Adaptive procedures control false discovery probability at the boundary under independence.
Some procedures maintain error control under positive dependence.
Simulation shows increased power compared to original SL procedure.
Abstract
A cornerstone of the multiple testing literature is the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure, which guarantees control of the FDR when -values are independent or positively dependent. While BH controls the average quality of rejections, it does not provide guarantees for individual discoveries, particularly those near the rejection threshold, which are more likely to be false than the average rejection. For independent -values with Uniform null distribution, the Support Line procedure (SL; arXiv:2207.07299) provably controls the error probability for the rejection at the edge of the discovery set (i.e. the one with largest -value) at level , where is the number of true null hypotheses and is a tuning parameter. In this work, we study adaptive versions of the SL procedure that operate in two steps: the first step estimates from non-significant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
