Comparing Physics-Informed and Neural ODE Approaches for Modeling Nonlinear Biological Systems: A Case Study Based on the Morris-Lecar Model

TL;DR

This study compares Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Neural ODEs in modeling nonlinear neuronal dynamics using the Morris-Lecar model, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations across different bifurcation regimes.

Contribution

It provides a systematic evaluation of PINNs and NODEs on a biological system, revealing their performance differences and trade-offs in modeling complex dynamics.

Findings

PINNs achieve higher accuracy in stiff and bifurcation-sensitive regimes.

NODEs are more flexible but less interpretable and stable in certain regimes.

Advanced NODE variants still face challenges with stiff dynamics.

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) represent two distinct machine learning frameworks for modeling nonlinear neuronal dynamics. This study systematically evaluates their performance on the two-dimensional Morris-Lecar model across three canonical bifurcation regimes: Hopf, Saddle-Node on Limit Cycle, and homoclinic orbit. Synthetic time-series data are generated via numerical integration under controlled conditions, and training is performed using collocation points for PINNs and adaptive solvers for NODEs (Dormand-Prince method). PINNs incorporate the governing differential equations into the loss function using automatic differentiation, which enforces physical consistency during training. In contrast, NODEs learn the system's vector field directly from data, without prior structural assumptions or inductive bias toward physical laws. Model performance is assessed using standard regression metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and the coefficient of determination. Results indicate that PINNs tend to achieve higher accuracy and robustness in scenarios involving stiffness or sensitive bifurcations, owing to their embedded physical structure. NODEs, while more expressive and flexible, operate as black-box approximators without structural constraints, which can lead to reduced interpretability and stability in these regimes. Although advanced variants of NODEs (e.g., ANODEs, latent NODEs) aim to mitigate such limitations, their performance under stiff dynamics remains an open question. These findings emphasize the trade-offs between physics-informed models, which embed structure and interpretability, and purely data-driven approaches, which prioritize flexibility at the cost of physical consistency.