The role of polarization field terms in a model for a cavity quantum material
Arwen Lloyd, Adam Stokes, Alessandro Principi, Ahsan Nazir

TL;DR
This paper examines the validity and limitations of the Peierls substitution in modeling light-matter interactions in cavity quantum materials, highlighting gauge-dependent differences and the importance of polarization effects.
Contribution
It derives the Peierls gauge description via canonical transformations and compares it with Coulomb and dipole gauges in a multi-band toy model, revealing gauge-dependent subsystem definitions.
Findings
Peierls substitution is justified as a low-energy, single-band approximation in 1D.
It neglects self-polarization corrections and interband couplings in the full theory.
Different gauges partition the system into light and matter differently, affecting observable predictions.
Abstract
Constructing models for cavity quantum materials requires a careful treatment of the light-matter coupling. In general, one must specify matrix elements constructed from the material wavefunctions, which are often unknown in a tight-binding framework. The Peierls substitution is often used to avoid introducing these additional parameters in the multi-center dipole (or Peiels) gauge, under the assumption that contributions from intraband and interband dipole moments can be neglected in the low-energy theory. We present the derivation of the Peierls gauge description in the passive view of canonical transformations. We construct a toy model for a multi-band system with two sites, which we couple to a uniform field in the Coulomb, dipole, and Peierls gauges. We find that the Peierls substitution can be justified as a low-energy, effectively single-band description in one dimension, but it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
