Resolving the Robustness-Precision Trade-off in Financial RAG through Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval

TL;DR

This paper introduces HDRR, a hybrid retrieval method for financial question answering that combines document routing and chunk retrieval to improve robustness and precision.

Contribution

It proposes HDRR, a two-stage retrieval architecture that effectively balances robustness and precision in financial document QA tasks.

Findings

HDRR outperforms existing methods on the FinDER benchmark.

HDRR achieves the lowest failure rate of 6.4%.

HDRR attains the highest correctness rate of 67.7%.

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for financial document question answering typically follow a chunk-based paradigm: documents are split into fragments, embedded into vector space, and retrieved via similarity search. While effective in general settings, this approach suffers from cross-document chunk confusion in structurally homogeneous corpora such as regulatory filings. Semantic File Routing (SFR), which uses LLM structured output to route queries to whole documents, reduces catastrophic failures but sacrifices the precision of targeted chunk retrieval. We identify this robustness-precision trade-off through controlled evaluation on the FinDER benchmark (1,500 queries across five groups): SFR achieves higher average scores (6.45 vs. 6.02) and fewer failures (10.3% vs. 22.5%), while chunk-based retrieval (CBR) yields more perfect answers (13.8% vs. 8.5%). To resolve this trade-off, we propose Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval (HDRR), a two-stage architecture that uses SFR as a document filter followed by chunk-based retrieval scoped to the identified document(s). HDRR eliminates cross-document confusion while preserving targeted chunk precision. Experimental results demonstrate that HDRR achieves the best performance on every metric: an average score of 7.54 (25.2% above CBR, 16.9% above SFR), a failure rate of only 6.4%, a correctness rate of 67.7% (+18.7 pp over CBR), and a perfect-answer rate of 20.1% (+6.3 pp over CBR, +11.6 pp over SFR). HDRR resolves the trade-off by simultaneously achieving the lowest failure rate and the highest precision across all five experimental groups.