A Comparative Investigation of Thermodynamic Structure-Informed Neural Networks
Guojie Li, Liu Hong

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares various thermodynamic structure-informed neural networks, evaluating their accuracy, physical consistency, and robustness across different thermodynamic formulations and differential equations.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of thermodynamic formulations in neural networks, highlighting their impact on physical accuracy and robustness.
Findings
Newtonian-residual PINNs reconstruct states but lack thermodynamic quantity recovery
Structure-preserving formulations improve parameter identification and thermodynamic consistency
Results guide principled design of thermodynamics-consistent models
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a unified framework for solving both forward and inverse problems of differential equations, yet their performance and physical consistency strongly depend on how governing laws are incorporated. In this work, we present a systematic comparison of different thermodynamic structure-informed neural networks by incorporating various thermodynamics formulations, including Newtonian, Lagrangian, and Hamiltonian mechanics for conservative systems, as well as the Onsager variational principle and extended irreversible thermodynamics for dissipative systems. Through comprehensive numerical experiments on representative ordinary and partial differential equations, we quantitatively evaluate the impact of these formulations on accuracy, physical consistency, noise robustness, and interpretability. The results show that Newtonian-residual-based PINNs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
