On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI
Andres Alonso-Robisco, Carlos Esparcia, Francisco Jare\~no

TL;DR
This paper examines the environmental impact of generative AI in economic research workflows, highlighting how prompt engineering and human governance can reduce carbon footprints.
Contribution
It shifts analysis from AI models to research workflows, benchmarking a GenAI-assisted economic survey process and identifying effective green prompt strategies.
Findings
Operational constraints and decision rule prompts significantly reduce CO2 emissions.
Generic green language prompts have no reliable impact on footprint.
Human governance is a practical lever for environmental efficiency.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to write and refactor research code, expanding computational workflows. At the same time, Green AI research has largely measured the footprint of models rather than the downstream workflows in which GenAI is a tool. We shift the unit of analysis from models to workflows and treat prompts as decision policies that allocate discretion between researcher and system, governing what is executed and when iteration stops. We contribute in two ways. First, we map the recent Green AI literature into seven themes: training footprint is the largest cluster, while inference efficiency and system level optimisation are growing rapidly, alongside measurement protocols, green algorithms, governance, and security and efficiency trade-offs. Second, we benchmark a modern economic survey workflow, an LDA-based literature mapping implemented with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
