Extracting Cosmological Information from Lightcone Data: A Comparison of CNNs and Summary-Statistic-Based Approaches
Min Zhiwei, Xiao Xu, Jiang Zhujun, Xiao Liang, Yin Fenfen, Ding Jiacheng, Miao Haitao, Chen Shupei, Lin Qiufan, Wang yang, Zhang Le, Li XiaoDong

TL;DR
This paper compares CNN-based and summary statistic-based methods for extracting cosmological information from lightcone data, finding that both approaches can be effective with different strengths, informing future galaxy survey analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a CNN+2D approach for lightcone analysis and systematically compares it with traditional summary statistics and fully connected networks, highlighting their relative performance.
Findings
FC networks with $a_{\ell m}$ and WST outperform 2PCF-based methods.
CNN+2D achieves the smallest uncertainties for a fiducial cosmology.
Both learned features and summary statistics are effective for cosmological inference.
Abstract
Lightcone observations are the natural data format of galaxy surveys, but their evolving geometry breaks the translational symmetry assumed by standard convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In particular, applying CNNs to 3D gridded lightcone data implicitly treats the line-of-sight direction as translationally invariant, despite encoding cosmic time evolution. We propose a simple alternative (CNN+2D) that divides the lightcone into redshift slices, projects each onto a HEALPix sphere, and analyzes them with a 2D CNN. Using \texttt{AbacusSummit} halo lightcone mocks (, ), we compare this approach with fully connected networks (FC) applied to different summary statistics, including spherical harmonic coefficients (), wavelet scattering transform (WST) coefficients, and the angular two-point correlation function (2PCF), along with standard…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
