On the interpretation of Hahn echo measurements in electron spin resonance scanning tunneling microscopy
Paul Greule, Wantong Huang, M\'at\'e Stark, Kwan Ho Au-Yeung, Christoph Wolf, Soo-hyon Phark, Andreas J. Heinrich, Philip Willke

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Hahn echo measurements in ESR-STM can be misinterpreted due to tunneling electron effects, proposing methods to reliably extract spin coherence times.
Contribution
It demonstrates that RF-induced tunneling effects can distort Hahn echo signals and offers practical criteria to accurately measure spin coherence times in ESR-STM.
Findings
Hahn echo signals in ESR-STM are susceptible to tunneling electron effects.
Varying delay times in refocusing sequences helps confirm true coherence.
Estimated T2 coherence time is approximately 30 ns, shorter than previous reports.
Abstract
Electron spin resonance scanning tunneling microscopy (ESR-STM) has become a powerful tool for probing spin dynamics and coherence of individual atoms and molecules on surfaces. In this work, we perform Rabi oscillation and Hahn echo pulse protocols on individual iron phthalocyanine (FePc) molecules on MgO/Ag(001) using ESR-STM. While Hahn echo protocols are widely used to extract spin coherence times, we show that in ESR-STM they are particularly susceptible to misinterpretation due to tunneling electrons generated by the applied radio-frequency (RF) voltage. The RF voltage not only drives the spin, but simultaneously probes and relaxes it, which consequently leads to an exponential decay that reflects spin relaxation rather than intrinsic phase coherence. We moreover show that varying both delay times in the refocusing pulse sequence is a reliable way to ensure a coherent nature of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
