The atomic bomb: its history and the struggles of scientists
Shoji Nagamiya

TL;DR
This paper explores the historical development of the atomic bomb and examines scientists' moral dilemmas and ethical considerations surrounding its use and aftermath.
Contribution
It provides a detailed account of scientists' moral struggles and ethical debates during the atomic bomb's development and deployment.
Findings
Scientists faced profound moral dilemmas over nuclear weapons.
Some scientists opposed or warned against the bomb's use.
The article discusses individual remorse and ethical guidance for future research.
Abstract
In this article, I trace the early historical developments that ultimately led to the creation of the atomic bomb. Even after the completion of weapons, many scientists continued to argue that nuclear armaments were indispensable for maintaining the global balance of political power [1]. This study focuses on several scientists who confronted profound moral dilemmas concerning the use of bombs against Japan. Some openly opposed its deployment. Others sought to warn a Japanese physicist in the hope of averting further devastation. Still, others expressed deep remorse in its aftermath. In addition, the experience of an individual directly affected by the bombing is discussed. By examining these episodes, this article aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on how scientific research should be guided by ethical principles in the future.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
