TL;DR
This paper evaluates the robustness of LLM-enhanced GNNs against various poisoning attacks, demonstrating their higher accuracy and resilience compared to baseline models through comprehensive experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic framework for assessing LLM-enhanced GNN robustness against diverse poisoning attacks and provides insights into factors contributing to their resilience.
Findings
LLM-enhanced GNNs outperform shallow baselines under attack.
Robustness linked to encoding structural and label info in node representations.
Proposes new attack and defense strategies for graph data security.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by enriching node representations with semantic features, giving rise to LLM-enhanced GNNs that achieve notable performance gains. However, the robustness of these models against poisoning attacks, which manipulate both graph structures and textual attributes during training, remains unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose a robustness assessment framework that systematically evaluates LLM-enhanced GNNs under poisoning attacks. Our framework enables comprehensive evaluation across multiple dimensions. Specifically, we assess 24 victim models by combining eight LLM- or Language Model (LM)-based feature enhancers with three representative GNN backbones. To ensure diversity in attack coverage, we incorporate six structural poisoning attacks (both targeted and non-targeted) and three textual poisoning attacks…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
