Identification of Bivariate Causal Directionality Based on Anticipated Asymmetric Geometries

TL;DR

This paper introduces two novel methods, Anticipated Asymmetric Geometries and Monotonicity Index, for determining causal direction in bivariate data, demonstrating superior accuracy over existing approaches.

Contribution

The paper proposes and evaluates two new methods for causal direction identification based on conditional distributions, outperforming previous techniques.

Findings

AAG method achieves up to 77.9% accuracy on real-world data.

Both methods outperform the ANMs baseline.

Hyperparameter tuning improves method robustness.

Abstract

Identification of causal directionality in bivariate numerical data is a fundamental research problem with important practical implications. This paper presents two alternative methods to identify direction of causation by considering conditional distributions: (1) Anticipated Asymmetric Geometries (AAG) and (2) Monotonicity Index. The AAG method compares the actual conditional distributions to anticipated ones along two variables. Different comparison metrics, such as correlation, cosine similarity, Jaccard index, K-L divergence, K-S distance, and mutual information have been evaluated. Anticipated distributions have been projected as normal based on dual response statistics: mean and standard deviation. The Monotonicity Index approach compares the calculated monotonicity indexes of the gradients of conditional distributions along two axes and exhibits counts of gradient sign changes. Both methods assume stochastic properties of the bivariate data and exploit anticipated unimodality of conditional distributions of the effect. It turns out that the tuned AAG method outperforms the Monotonicity Index and reaches a top accuracy of 77.9% compared to ANMs accuracy of 63 +/- 10% when classifying 95 pairs of real-world examples (Mooij et al, 2014). The described methods include a number of hyperparameters that impact accuracy of the identification. For a given set of hyperparameters, both the AAG or Monotonicity Index method provide a unique deterministic outcome of the solution. To address sensitivity to hyperparameters, tuning of hyperparameters has been done by utilizing a full factorial Design of Experiment. A decision tree has been fitted to distinguish misclassified cases using the input data's symmetrical bivariate statistics to address the question of: How decisive is the identification method of causal directionality?