Assessing Reporting Delays in ACLED Conflict Event Data
Faniry A. Razakason, Daniel Racek, Paul W. Thurner, G\"oran Kauermann

TL;DR
This paper analyzes reporting delays in ACLED conflict data, revealing systematic biases based on event type, fatalities, location, and political context, which affect real-time conflict monitoring.
Contribution
It provides a statistical framework to understand and model reporting delays, enabling correction of biases in conflict event data analysis.
Findings
Over half of events are reported within two weeks.
Reporting delays vary systematically by event and country characteristics.
Delays are structured, not random, affecting real-time conflict analysis.
Abstract
Timely and accurate conflict event data are essential for real-time monitoring, forecasting, and policy response. Yet near-real-time conflict datasets such as the Armed Conflict Location \& Event Data Project (ACLED) are subject to reporting delays, that is, delays between event occurrence and first inclusion in the database. Such delays can introduce bias in short-term analyses and forecasts. This study provides a statistical analysis of reporting delays for African events recorded in ACLED's weekly releases from June 30, 2024, to June 1, 2025. Treating delay as a discrete time duration, we estimate grouped proportional hazards models with additive-linear and smooth terms incorporating event-level, spatial, and country-level covariates. Our results show that more than half of events are reported within two weeks, but delays vary systematically by event type, fatalities, geographic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
