Data-Driven Modal Decomposition Analysis of Unsteady Flow in a Multi-Stage Turbine
Yalu Zhu, Feng Liu

TL;DR
This study compares POD and DMD modal analysis methods applied to unsteady flow in a turbine, highlighting their effectiveness in reconstructing flow features and capturing dynamic behavior.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates multiple DMD variants against POD for analyzing turbine flow, revealing their relative accuracy and dynamic insights.
Findings
DMD variants achieve reconstruction accuracy comparable to POD.
Neutral DMD modes dominate the unsteady flow dynamics.
Higher adiabatic efficiency correlates with larger mode components.
Abstract
Two data-driven modal analysis approaches, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), are applied to analyze the unsteady flow obtained by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations in a 1.5-stage axial turbine. The reduced-order reconstructed pressure, dominant mode shapes, and dynamic features of these dominant modes in the downstream stator of the turbine are compared between POD and four DMD variants. It is found that the DMD methods based on the amplitude criterion, the Tissot criterion, and the sparsity-promoting DMD (SP-DMD) achieve reconstruction accuracy comparable to that of POD, while the frequency criterion proves unsuitable for the present problem. The second and third POD and DMD modes capture the dominant pressure fluctuation structures within the stator, and there is similarity between the corresponding POD and DMD…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization · Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
