Can an Actor-Critic Optimization Framework Improve Analog Design Optimization?

TL;DR

This paper introduces an actor-critic optimization framework for analog circuit sizing that guides the search process more intelligently, improving design quality and stability over traditional methods.

Contribution

It presents a novel actor-critic based approach that separates proposal and evaluation in analog design optimization, enhancing interpretability and effectiveness.

Findings

Achieves an average of 38.9% improvement in figure of merit.

Reduces regret by an average of 24.7%.

Peak gains of 70.5% in FoM and 42.2% lower regret.

Abstract

Analog design often slows down because even small changes to device sizes or biases require expensive simulation cycles, and high-quality solutions typically occupy only a narrow part of a very large search space. While existing optimizers reduce some of this burden, they largely operate without the kind of judgment designers use when deciding where to search next. This paper presents an actor-critic optimization framework (ACOF) for analog sizing that brings that form of guidance into the loop. Rather than treating optimization as a purely black-box search problem, ACOF separates the roles of proposal and evaluation: an actor suggests promising regions of the design space, while a critic reviews those choices, enforces design legality, and redirects the search when progress is hampered. This structure preserves compatibility with standard simulator-based flows while making the search process more deliberate, stable, and interpretable. Across our test circuits, ACOF improves the top-10 figure of merit by an average of 38.9% over the strongest competing baseline and reduces regret by an average of 24.7%, with peak gains of 70.5% in FoM and 42.2% lower regret on individual circuits. By combining iterative reasoning with simulation-driven search, the framework offers a more transparent path toward automated analog sizing across challenging design spaces.