Trends in Equal-Contribution Authorship: A Large-Scale Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Literature
Binbin Xu

TL;DR
This large-scale bibliometric study analyzes the increasing trend of equal-contribution authorship in biomedical literature from 2010 to 2024, highlighting geographic, journal, and positional patterns.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of global and journal-level trends in equal-contribution authorship over a 14-year period.
Findings
Sharp increase in equal-contribution authorship after 2017
China leads in fractionalized contributions with 40.8%
Equal-contribution is mostly concentrated near the first-author position
Abstract
Equal-contribution authorship, in which two or more authors are designated as having contributed equally, is increasingly common in scientific publishing. Using approximately 480,000 tagged records from PubMed and PMC (2010-2024), we examine temporal trends, journal-level patterns, geographic distributions, and byline positions of equal-contributing authors. Results show a sharp rise after 2017, with both high-output mega-journals and smaller, discipline-specific journals contributing to the growth. Journal-level analysis indicates a median increase in the share of tagged articles from about 19% in 2015 to over 30% in 2024, with some journals exceeding 50%. Geographically, China accounts for the largest share (40.8% of fractionalized contributions), followed by the United States (15.2%) and Germany (5.2%). Normalizing to 2015 baselines, China shows a 13.1x; increase by 2024, while even…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
