On the equivalence of Brantner's and Chu--Haugseng's approaches to enriched $\infty$-operads
Kensuke Arakawa

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of two models of enriched ∞-operads by Brantner and Chu--Haugseng, unifying their approaches and implications for algebraic structures.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of two models of enriched ∞-operads and their associated monoidal ∞-categories, linking their constructions and results.
Findings
Models of enriched ∞-operads are equivalent.
Equivalence of monoidal ∞-categories of symmetric sequences.
Results like algebra notions and Koszul duality are also equivalent.
Abstract
We prove that two models of (monochromatic) enriched -operads, due to Brantner and Chu--Haugseng, are equivalent. We show this as a consequence of the equivalence of two models of monoidal -categories of symmetric sequences and the composition product, due to Brantner and Haugseng. As a consequence, constructions and results formulated in either framework, such as notions of algebra and Koszul duality, are also shown to be equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
