Unveiling the Mechanism of Continuous Representation Full-Waveform Inversion: A Wave Based Neural Tangent Kernel Framework
Ruihua Chen, Yisi Luo, Bangyu Wu, Deyu Meng

TL;DR
This paper develops a wave-based neural tangent kernel framework to understand continuous representation full-waveform inversion, revealing its slower high-frequency convergence and robustness to initial models, and proposes improved hybrid methods.
Contribution
It introduces a wave-based NTK analysis for FWI, explaining its properties and proposing new methods with better convergence and robustness.
Findings
Wave-based NTK is non-constant during training.
CR-FWI reduces dependency on initial models.
Proposed hybrid INR and grid method improves convergence.
Abstract
Full-waveform inversion (FWI) estimates physical parameters in the wave equation from limited measurements and has been widely applied in geophysical exploration, medical imaging, and non-destructive testing. Conventional FWI methods are limited by their notorious sensitivity to the accuracy of the initial models. Recent progress in continuous representation FWI (CR-FWI) demonstrates that representing parameter models with a coordinate-based neural network, such as implicit neural representation (INR), can mitigate the dependence on initial models. However, its underlying mechanism remains unclear, and INR-based FWI shows slower high-frequency convergence. In this work, we investigate the general CR-FWI framework and develop a unified theoretical understanding by extending the neural tangent kernel (NTK) for FWI to establish a wave-based NTK framework. Unlike standard NTK, our analysis…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
- Interdisciplinary theoretical contribution. The wave-based NTK framework is a thoughtful specialization of NTK tools to FWI that helps explain observed phenomena (robustness to initialization, spectral bias / slow high-freq convergence). This new perspective can guide architecture and sampling choices. - Use of standard, realistic benchmarks. The authors report results on well-known FWI models (Marmousi, SEG/EAGE Salt & Overthrust, BP, Chevron). Using these makes the claims more credible to a
- Ablation & failure modes. The paper claims IG-FWI is an “optimal trade-off” — I’d expect ablations that vary eigenvalue decay (e.g., different INR frequency bases, different grid scales) and show how performance changes. Please also show failure cases. - The paper does not compare CR-FWI or IG-FWI with data-driven inversion methods (e.g., supervised CNN-based methods) on synthetic datasets such as OpenFWI. These baselines are now standard in the ML-driven FWI literature. The omission limits t
1. I think the insights regarding eigenvalue decay behaviors are valuable to the community for future algorithm development. 2. The authors provided solid, step-by-step derivations of the theories proposed in the paper. 3. The proposed methods (MPE-FWI and IG-FWI) have clear theories to explain their performance in terms of accuracy, robustness and convergence. 4. The proposed methods achieved superior performance on the public benchmark datasets, which is convincing.
1. Among the proposed methods, LR-FWI lacks an analysis of its eigenvalue decay behavior and is discussed much less than the other two methods (MPE-FWI and IG-FWI). I think it is important as LR-FWI yields promising performance, and it even outperforms IG-FWI in some cases. 2. Although data-driven and physics-informed FWI methods are covered in the related works section, they are missing in the experiments. The experiments can be more solid by including a few of them as the additional baselines.
1) The authors employ NTK theory to study the spectral bias problem when using neural networks in an FWI setting. This is a very well defined problem, and has not been addressed in a lot of previous studies; even though the idea of using neural netowkrs for the material field is used in several works. This makes the study particularly relevant, not just for seismic imaging, but also nondestructive testing. 2) The authors not only analyze the issues of FWI in this setting, but also propose a new
* The manuscript contains the term "nonlinear partial differential equation" multiple times (l011, l046, l104, l107, l232), but equation (1) is a linear PDE (the classical wave equation). The linearity of the wave equation does not matter for the inverse problem being nonlinear, but it is strange that the authors refer to the nonlinearity so often. * More literature on FWI with neural networks material fields should be cited. - Rasht‐Behesht, Majid, Christian Huber, Khemraj Shukla, and George
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
