Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved Bounds
H{\aa}vard Bakke Bjerkevik, Joseph Dorfer, Linda Kleist, Torsten Ueckerdt, and Birgit Vogtenhuber

TL;DR
This paper proves that computing flip distance between non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even in convex position, and provides improved bounds on the diameter of the flip graph using conflict graphs as a key tool.
Contribution
It establishes NP-hardness for flip distance computation with various flip types and improves bounds on flip graph diameter using conflict graph analysis.
Findings
NP-hardness of flip distance computation for convex point sets
New upper bound of 0/9(n-1) for flip graph diameter with stacked trees
Improved lower bound of 11/7 n for flip graph diameter in convex position
Abstract
We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set of points in general position in the plane, the flip graph has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam for sets of points in convex position. The current best bounds are diam [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
