Online Packing of Orthogonal Polygons

TL;DR

This paper investigates the online packing problem for orthogonal polygons, revealing complexity-dependent bounds and demonstrating that simple algorithms are optimal in certain cases, especially for polygons with higher complexity.

Contribution

It provides new bounds on the competitive ratios for online packing of orthogonal polygons of small complexity, highlighting the impact of shape complexity and symmetry.

Findings

Competitive ratio for 6-gons is in Ω(n / log n).

Constant competitive algorithms exist for symmetric or small 6-gons.

Trivial n-competitive algorithm is optimal for 8-gons and skeletons.

Abstract

While rectangular and box-shaped objects dominate the classic discourse of theoretic investigations, a fascinating frontier lies in packing more complex shapes. Given recent insights that convex polygons do not allow for constant competitive online algorithms for diverse variants under translation, we study orthogonal polygons, in particular of small complexity. For translational packings of orthogonal 6-gons, we show that the competitive ratio of any online algorithm that aims to pack the items into a minimal number of unit bins is in $\Omega(n / \log n)$, where $n$ denotes the number of objects. In contrast, we show that constant competitive algorithms exist when the orthogonal 6-gons are symmetric or small. For (orthogonally convex) orthogonal 8-gons, we show that the trivial $n$-competitive algorithm, which places each item in its own bin, is best-possible, i.e., every online algorithm has an asymptotic competitive ratio of at least $n$. This implies that for general orthogonal polygons, the trivial algorithm is best possible. Interestingly, for packing degenerate orthogonal polygons (with thickness $0$), called skeletons, the change in complexity is even more drastic. While constant competitive algorithms for 6-skeletons exist, no online algorithm for 8-skeletons achieves a competitive ratio better than $n$. For other packing variants of orthogonal 6-gons under translation, our insights imply the following consequences. The asymptotic competitive ratio of any online algorithm is in $\Omega(n / \log n)$ for strip packing, and there exist online algorithms with competitive ratios in $O(1)$ for perimeter packing, or in $O(\sqrt{n})$ for minimizing the area of the bounding box. Moreover, the critical packing density is positive (if every object individually fits into the interior of a unit bin).