Exploring self-driving labs for optoelectronic materials
Jonathan Staaf Scragg

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new exploration-driven self-driving laboratory paradigm focused on generating data to understand defect physics in optoelectronic materials, exemplified through a case study on Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4.
Contribution
It introduces a scientific SDL framework for defect-aware materials exploration, emphasizing data generation for mechanistic understanding beyond optimization.
Findings
Demonstrates the scale of defect-aware exploration in optoelectronic materials.
Highlights limitations of current optimization-driven SDLs.
Proposes design principles for physics-informed data collection.
Abstract
Self-driving laboratories (SDLs), by combining automation with machine learning-guided experiment selection, have the potential to transform experimental materials science. To date, most SDLs have been optimisation-driven, designed to rapidly converge on performance metrics, by embedding multiple mechanistic layers within platform-specific surrogate models. Such approaches excel at process tuning yet offer limited insight into the underlying physics governing synthesis-property relationships. Here we articulate a complementary paradigm: the exploration-driven, or scientific, SDL, whose primary purpose is the generation of data for data-driven science. We exemplify this concept for the case of inorganic optoelectronic materials, arguing that defect physics, which forms the central mechanistic link between synthesis conditions and functional properties, provides the foundation for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
