From seesaw over-suppression to trimaximal mixing: why $A_4$ is the minimal resolution of the $Z_3$ neutrino failure
Navid Ardakanian

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the $A_4$ symmetry can resolve the failures of the $Z_3$ framework in neutrino mass models, leading to realistic mass ratios and mixing angles consistent with experimental data.
Contribution
It shows that $A_4$ symmetry provides a minimal and effective solution to the shortcomings of the $Z_3$ neutrino models, especially in reproducing observed neutrino oscillation parameters.
Findings
$Z_3$ framework fails to produce realistic neutrino mass ratios.
$A_4$ symmetry yields the trimaximal TM$_1$ mixing pattern.
Predictions for neutrino mixing angles and CP phase are testable at upcoming experiments.
Abstract
We investigate whether the type-I seesaw mechanism can rescue the Froggatt--Nielsen framework for neutrinos and find that it cannot. With right-handed Majorana masses carrying the charge structure dictated by the Majorana bilinear -- where suppression powers follow -- the mass matrix contains an unsuppressed off-diagonal entry whose dominance in , combined with the hierarchical column texture of , over-suppresses the two lightest neutrino masses to while remains . This pushes the solar-to-atmospheric mass ratio to a median -- eight orders of magnitude below the observed value of . We prove this failure is universal across all six permutations of the charges and show analytically that the generic ratio scales as $\Delta…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
