WirelessBench: A Tolerance-Aware LLM Agent Benchmark for Wireless Network Intelligence
Jingwen Tong, Fang Liu, Linkai Xv, Shiliang Lu, Kangqi Li, Yiqian Zhang, Yijie Song, Zeyang Xue, Jun Zhang

TL;DR
WirelessBench introduces a comprehensive, tolerance-aware benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in wireless network management, capturing real-world risks, cascading failures, and enabling detailed diagnostics.
Contribution
It is the first to provide a tolerance-aware, tool-integrated benchmark with hierarchical evaluation and fine-grained error analysis for wireless LLM agents.
Findings
Tool-integrated agent outperforms direct prompting (84.64% vs 68%).
23% of errors are catastrophic failures.
Hierarchical evaluation reveals four diagnostic error categories.
Abstract
LLM agents are emerging as a key enabler for autonomous wireless network management. Reliably deploying them, however, demands benchmarks that reflect real engineering risk. Existing wireless benchmarks evaluate single isolated capabilities and treat all errors uniformly, missing both cascaded-chain failures and catastrophic unit confusions (\textit{e.g.}, dB vs.\ dBm). We present \wb{}, the first tolerance-aware, tool-integrated benchmark for LLM-based wireless agents. \wb{} is organized as a three-tier cognitive hierarchy: domain knowledge reasoning (WCHW, 1{,}392 items), intent-driven resource allocation (WCNS, 1{,}000 items), and proactive multi-step decisions under mobility (WCMSA, 1{,}000 items). Moreover, \wb{} is established on three design principles: \emph{(i)}~tolerance-aware scoring with catastrophic-error detection; \emph{(ii)}~tool-necessary tasks requiring a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile Agent-Based Network Management · Access Control and Trust · Software System Performance and Reliability
