ReasonScaffold: A Scaffolded Reasoning-based Annotation Protocol for Human-AI Co-Annotation
Smitha Muthya Sudheendra, Jaideep Srivastava

TL;DR
ReasonScaffold is a protocol that uses LLM-generated explanations to improve human annotation consistency in NLP tasks by encouraging minimal revisions and increasing agreement.
Contribution
This work introduces a novel reasoning-based annotation protocol that leverages LLM explanations to enhance human annotation reliability and consistency.
Findings
Exposure to reasoning explanations increases inter-annotator agreement.
The protocol leads to minimal revisions after initial annotations.
Reasoning explanations help resolve ambiguous cases without widespread changes.
Abstract
Human annotation is central to NLP evaluation, yet subjective tasks often exhibit substantial variability across annotators. While large language models (LLMs) can provide structured reasoning to support annotation, their influence on human annotation behavior remains underexplored. We introduce \textbf{ReasonScaffold}, a scaffolded reasoning annotation protocol that exposes LLM-generated explanations while withholding predicted labels. We study how reasoning affects human annotation behavior in a controlled setting, rather than evaluating annotation accuracy. Using a two-pass protocol inspired by Delphi-style revision, annotators first label instances independently and then revise their decisions after viewing model-generated reasoning. We evaluate the approach on sentiment classification and opinion detection tasks, analyzing changes in inter-annotator agreement and revision behavior.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
