Stability of Sequential and Parallel Coordinate Ascent Variational Inference
Debdeep Pati

TL;DR
This paper compares the convergence properties of sequential and parallel coordinate ascent variational inference algorithms, revealing that the sequential version, despite being slower, has more relaxed convergence guarantees in high-dimensional linear regression.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of the differing convergence behaviors of sequential and parallel variational inference algorithms in complex models.
Findings
Sequential algorithm has more relaxed convergence conditions.
Parallel algorithm is faster but less guaranteed to converge.
Differences are significant in high-dimensional linear regression.
Abstract
We highlight a striking difference in behavior between two widely used variants of coordinate ascent variational inference: the sequential and parallel algorithms. While such differences were known in the numerical analysis literature in simpler settings, they remain largely unexplored in the optimization-focused literature on variational inference in more complex models. Focusing on the moderately high-dimensional linear regression problem, we show that the sequential algorithm, although typically slower, enjoys convergence guarantees under more relaxed conditions than the parallel variant, which is often employed to facilitate block-wise updates and improve computational efficiency.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
