Correcting for Missing Data When Evaluating Surrogate Markers in a Clinical Trial
Sarah C. Lotspeich, P.D. Anh. Nguyen, and Layla Parast

TL;DR
This paper introduces new statistical methods to evaluate surrogate markers in clinical trials with missing data, improving accuracy and efficiency over traditional complete case analysis.
Contribution
It develops inverse probability weighting and semiparametric maximum likelihood methods to handle missing data in surrogate marker evaluation, implemented in the MissSurrogate R package.
Findings
Methods remain unbiased under various missing data mechanisms
Enhanced statistical precision compared to complete case analysis
Practical application demonstrated in a diabetes trial
Abstract
Evaluating treatment effects is critical in clinical trials but sometimes involves lengthy, invasive, or costly follow-up procedures. In these cases, surrogate markers, which provide intermediate measures of the long-term treatment effect, allow clinicians to obtain results faster and more efficiently than would have otherwise been possible. Prior to adoption, it is vital that the utility of surrogate markers (i.e., their ability to capture the treatment effect on the primary outcome) is statistically validated. Many frameworks for evaluating surrogate markers have been proposed, but they do not account for missing data. Instead, they rely on complete cases (the subset of patients without missing data), which can be inefficient and biased. To improve on this, we propose methods to accommodate missing data in nonparametric and parametric surrogate evaluation via inverse probability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
