Review and Analysis of Scientific Paper Embellishments
Jiayi Hong, Yixuan Wang, Petra Isenberg, Ross Maciejewski

TL;DR
This paper systematically reviews the use of visual embellishments in scientific papers, analyzing their purposes, design, and placement to understand their impact on scientific communication.
Contribution
It offers a structured analysis of embellishments in visualization papers, identifying key dimensions and providing insights into their role in scientific writing.
Findings
Identified 374 papers using embellishments from 2019-2024.
Characterized embellishments by purpose, design, and location.
Provided a structured perspective on current practices.
Abstract
We present a review and analysis of scientific paper embellishments -- simple visual elements that are deeply integrated into the text of scientific publications. These embellishments are increasingly used in research papers, which have the potential to enhance textual descriptions, strengthen connections between figures and content, and improve internal textual coherence, while also carrying the risk of disrupting the reading experience. As their exact impact is not yet well understood, we conducted a systematic review of all visualization papers published between 2019 and 2024 in IEEE VIS, ACM CHI, and EuroVis. From this corpus, we identified 374 papers that used paper embellishments and distilled three key dimensions that characterize their usage: purposes (WHY), design choices (HOW), and locations (WHERE) of paper embellishments. Our findings provide a structured perspective on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Visualization and Analytics · Academic Writing and Publishing · Interactive and Immersive Displays
