Approximate posterior recalibration
Tiffany Cai, Philip Greengard, Ben Goodrich, Andrew Gelman

TL;DR
This paper introduces two methods to recalibrate approximate Bayesian posteriors, ensuring they better reflect true uncertainty, demonstrated through various experiments and applicable to hierarchical models.
Contribution
The paper presents novel methods extending simulation-based calibration to improve the uncertainty quantification of approximate posteriors.
Findings
Methods successfully widen credible intervals for better calibration.
Experimental results show improved posterior uncertainty estimation.
Applicable to hierarchical Bayesian models.
Abstract
Bayesian inference is often implemented using approximations, which can yield interval estimates that are too narrow, not fully capturing the uncertainty in the posterior distribution. We address the question of how to adjust these approximate posteriors so that they appropriately capture uncertainty. vWe introduce two methods that extend simulation-based calibration checking (SBC) to widen approximate posterior uncertainty intervals to aim for marginal calibration. We demonstrate these methods in several experimental settings, and we discuss the challenge of calibration using posterior inferences and the potential for posterior recalibration of hierarchical models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
